Why Pinaki Bhattacharjee’s Proposal for the CHT Is a National Security Risk

Reading Time: 3 minutes Vlogger and commentator Pinaki Bhattacharjee’s latest proposal to grant a form of autonomy to the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) is not just misguided — it is dangerously naïve. His reasoning rests on shallow historical references and flawed analogies that, if taken seriously, would imperil Bangladesh’s sovereignty and national cohesion. The CHT is a sensitive strategic frontier region, not an experimental zone for political romanticism. Misreading History for Political Posturing Mr Bhattacharjee’s attempt to use pre-1971 administrative arrangements as a justification for autonomy reflects a poor grasp of both history and statecraft. Bangladesh emerged through a painful war of liberation that redrew the political and legal framework of this land once and for all. Any selective appeal to the pre-1971 period ignores the fact that the CHT’s status was decisively settled within the sovereign boundaries of Bangladesh. The 1997 CHT Peace Accord remains the legitimate and binding

This content is restricted to site members. If you are an existing user, please log in. New users may register below.

Existing Users Log In
   
Previous post Strategic Rationale for Raising a New Infantry Division in the Chittagong Hill Tracts
Next post M56/33 105 mm Towed Howitzer
error: This content is protected.